• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer navigation
  • Washington, D.C.
  • melissa@mkfamily.law
  • (202) 713-5165
  • mkfamily.law
Family Law Across Borders

Family Law Across Borders

International Family Law Resources

  • About MKFL
  • Websites
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Events
  • Contact

Case Update (12 April 2022): Soberano v. Guillen; sanctions against Petitioner’s Attorney

Case Update (12 April 2022): Soberano v. Guillen; sanctions against Petitioner’s Attorney

May 12, 2022

In a very unique situation, the District Court for the Western District of Washington, imposed sanctions against Ms. F. Andrekita Silva, the lawyer who was representing the Petitioner in a Hague Abduction case.

Approximately 1-2 weeks after the District Court held its evidentiary hearing in the Hague Abduction return proceeding filed by Ms. Silva, the parties signed a settlement agreement that the children could remain in the United States with Respondent. Nonetheless, after the agreement was signed, Ms. Silva began calling and leaving messages for the court, emphasizing the need for a final disposition on the Petitioner’s return request. On February 17, 2022, the Courtroom Deputy emailed both counsel apprising them of Ms. Silva’s requests for a disposition, at which time, Respondent’s lawyer notified the court that the parties had reached an agreement that resolved the Hague return petition, and provided evidence that she had asked Ms. Silva about notifying the court. The court scheduled a subsequent hearing to resolve the sequence of relevant events and to better understand the parties’ agreement, vis-a-vis this Hague Abduction return suit. The court concluded that the agreement resolved the central question related to the children’s return. It then turned to Ms. Silva’s behavior.

The court indicated that “[a]t numerous points throughout this case, the Court was concerned by Ms. Silva’s actions. On several occasions, the Court shared, or attempted to share, its concerns with Ms. Silva. But the Court’s efforts were generally met with indignation and argument.”

Ultimately, the court sanctioned Ms. Silva in an amount equal to the Respondent’s translation of the agreement to English (something that would need not be done, but for Ms. Silva’s actions), provided a copy of its sanctions order to the U.S. Department of State (who presumably had provided Ms. Silva’s name to the Petitioner), and filed a grievance with the Washington State Bar Association to determine if disciplinary action is warranted.

Category iconabduction,  Child Abduction,  Hague Abduction Convention,  sanctions

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe

Join 108 others, and get a notification to our new posts right on your inbox.

We promise we’ll never spam! Only notifications of new posts.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

The use of the name MK Family Law is protected as are the logo and content of this website. The information is provided by MK Family Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

© 2023 · MK Family Law · All Rights Reserved · Developed by RDK

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Attorney Advertising