• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer navigation
  • Washington, D.C.
  • melissa@mkfamily.law
  • (202) 713-5165
  • mkfamily.law
Family Law Across Borders

Family Law Across Borders

International Family Law Resources

  • About MKFL
  • Websites
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Events
  • Contact

Case Update (2020): MARG v. Texas Dept. F&PS; Third-Party custody, notice of Hague Abduction return request, inability to conduct home study in foreign country

Case Update (2020): MARG v. Texas Dept. F&PS; Third-Party custody, notice of Hague Abduction return request, inability to conduct home study in foreign country

December 28, 2020

Some interesting issues arose in the case of MARG v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services.  Third party caregivers were appointed as three (3) children’s conservators (custodians) in Texas.  The child’s mother, from whom the children were removed, was agreeable to the third parties having custody of the children.  At first, the father could not be located, and the children’s mother told authorities that she did not know his location or have his contact details.  The father was appointed an attorney, and eventually was located.  He alerted the Texas authorities that the oldest child had been abducted by the Mother quite some time before, and he had no idea to where she took the child.  The second child was in utero at the time of the abduction.  (The third child is not his child). He claims to have filed a criminal kidnapping action in Guatemala, where he lives, along with a police report, and a filing with the local court.  In the instant proceedings in Texas, he referenced a desire to have the children returned to him, and mentioned the Hague Abduction Convention.  

There are a variety of issues in this case: the father’s notice of his desire to initiate a Hague Abduction return petition; who should initiate that petition and at whose expense; concerns expressed in the Texas custody proceedings about the need for a home study in Guatemala and the lack of knowledge of how to do that in a foreign country; the eldest child’s lack of legal status in the United States; and third-party custody issues.

Ultimately the court reversed and remanded as to the two eldest children.

After you read the opinion, a few reminders. Article 16 of the Hague Abduction Convention says, “[a]fter receiving notice of a wrongful removal or retention of a child … the judicial or administrative authorities of the Contracting State to which the child has been removed or in which it has been retained shall not decide on the merits of rights of custody until it has been determined that the child is not to be returned under this Convention or unless an application under this Convention is not lodged within a reasonable time following receipt of the notice.”  Additionally, International Social Service works with cross-border families, and one of the many services it provides is coordinating home studies in these complex international cases. 

Category iconArticle 16,  Child Abduction,  custody,  Hague Abduction Convention,  home study,  immigration,  merits

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe

Join 108 others, and get a notification to our new posts right on your inbox.

We promise we’ll never spam! Only notifications of new posts.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

The use of the name MK Family Law is protected as are the logo and content of this website. The information is provided by MK Family Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

© 2023 · MK Family Law · All Rights Reserved · Developed by RDK

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Attorney Advertising