• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer navigation
  • Washington, D.C.
  • melissa@mkfamily.law
  • (202) 713-5165
  • mkfamily.law

International Family Law Resources

  • About MKFL
  • Websites
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Events
  • Contact

Case Update (2020): OG v. AB; Abduction Prevention, Restrictions on Passport Renewal, Ne Exeat

Case Update (2020): OG v. AB; Abduction Prevention, Restrictions on Passport Renewal, Ne Exeat

July 2, 2020

In the custody trial of OG v. AB, a Mother expressed her desire to take the parties’ children to visit her family in her native Russia but indicated that the Father was unwilling to give her the children’s expired Russian passports so that she could renew them for the travel.  The Father testified that the mother had previously threatened to “never let him see the Children again” and he was concerned she would not return to the United States once in Russia. The children are dual nationals of Russia and the United States.
At the conclusion of the trial, the parties were granted shared legal and physical custody and the court issued a writ of ne exeat, prohibiting either parent from traveling with the Children outside of the continental United States without the written consent of the other parent.  The court declined to authorize the renewal of the children’s Russian passports because Russia and the United States are not treaty partners under the Hague Child Abduction Convention.  It also credited Father’s testimony when he articulated his concerns that the Mother would retain the children in Russia.
On appeal, the Mother argued (among other things) that the court’s ne exeat violates her constitutional right to travel.  She also argued that the trial court’s decision could be construed so as to refuse her request to renew the children’s Russian passports.  
The appellate court noted that the mother’s constitutional right to international travel is not unqualified and can be regulated within the bounds of due process. It concluded that passport renewal is similar to a parent’s request to relocate his or her child, and the appropriate standard is to determine if it is in a child’s best interest to have his or her passport renewed.  
At trial, the court stated that restricting the children’s passport renewal “did not alter the children’s citizenship status” as dual nationals.  The court, however, made no findings or conclusions to support this statement. The appellate court remanded for the trial court to determine whether restricting the renewal of the children’s Russian passports would impact their status as dual nationals.  If restricting the passport renewals would cause the children to lose their dual citizenship, then the trial court is instructed to allow the renewal but put in place safeguards to prohibit the passports from being used without the court’s prior approval.  

close

Subscribe

Join 99 others, and get a notification to our new posts right on your inbox.

We promise we’ll never spam! Only notifications of new posts.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Category iconabduction,  Case Update,  Child Abduction,  Passport

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe

Join 99 others, and get a notification to our new posts right on your inbox.

We promise we’ll never spam! Only notifications of new posts.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

The use of the name MK Family Law is protected as are the logo and content of this website. The information is provided by MK Family Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

© 2022 · MK Family Law · All Rights Reserved · Developed by RDK

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Attorney Advertising