• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer navigation
  • Washington, D.C.
  • melissa@mkfamily.law
  • (202) 713-5165
  • mkfamily.law
Family Law Across Borders

Family Law Across Borders

International Family Law Resources

  • About MKFL
  • Websites
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Events
  • Contact

Case Update (30 Sept 2022): Garzon v. Hoffman; Motion for Enforcement to be filed in state court, not federal “Hague” court

Case Update (30 Sept 2022): Garzon v. Hoffman; Motion for Enforcement to be filed in state court, not federal “Hague” court

October 6, 2022

The parents, in this case, reached a settlement agreement related to Mr. Garzon’s request to have the parties’ two minor children returned to Colombia under the Hague Abduction Convention. As part of their settlement, the parents filed a request in the Circuit Court for Washtenaw County, Michigan, asking that the terms of the settlement be incorporated and merged into a Judgment of Custody, Parenting Time and Support. In June 2022, Mr. Garzon sent a letter to the federal district court that sat in the Hague Abduction proceeding, indicating that Ms. Hoffman was not complying with the terms of the settlement agreement. The court construed this letter as a motion to enforce, and denied it, instructing Mr. Garzon that he must file such a request in the state court proceeding.

This raises an excellent practice point. It is not uncommon that parents, even in the most contentious and high conflict of Hague Abduction return proceedings, reach an amicable and voluntary resolution. Once they do so, they need the guidance of skilled lawyers to guide them on the next steps. Should the agreement be filed in the court sitting in the Hague Abduction Convention case? Probably not, except to show that the case has been resolved, so that the matter can be dismissed. This is particularly true if the court is a federal court, with no jurisdiction over custody matters. It is further true because Article 16 of the Hague Abduction Convention makes clear that the Hague Abduction matter is not a custody case. It is common, however, for the voluntary agreement to be taken to the local (family) court in the country and venue that has jurisdiction over the issue of custody for the agreement to be made part of a court order. Weighing, strategically, how to file all the requisite paperwork in multiple proceedings in multiple countries and in what order, takes great skill, and good lawyers in both jurisdictions should be consulted.

Category iconabduction,  Child Abduction,  Contempt Proceedings,  enforcement,  Hague Abduction Convention,  jurisdiction,  subject matter jurisdiction,  voluntary agreement

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe

Join 108 others, and get a notification to our new posts right on your inbox.

We promise we’ll never spam! Only notifications of new posts.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

The use of the name MK Family Law is protected as are the logo and content of this website. The information is provided by MK Family Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

© 2023 · MK Family Law · All Rights Reserved · Developed by RDK

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Attorney Advertising