• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer navigation
  • Washington, D.C.
  • melissa@mkfamily.law
  • (202) 713-5165
  • mkfamily.law
Family Law Across Borders

Family Law Across Borders

International Family Law Resources

  • About MKFL
  • Websites
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Events
  • Contact

Case Update (31 January 2022): Garcia v. Ramsis; return of child to Spain; no grave risk proven

Case Update (31 January 2022): Garcia v. Ramsis; return of child to Spain; no grave risk proven

February 17, 2022

Mr. Garcia is SJG’s father. Ms. Ramsis is her mother. The child is a dual U.S.-Spanish national; Mr. Garcia is a Spanish national; and, Ms. Ramsis is an Egyptian national. SJG was born in 2018 in NY, and approximately 3 weeks after her birth, the family moved to Egypt for Mr. Garcia’s employment. The family lived in Egypt for approximately 1 year and 4 months before moving to Spain. They lived together in Spain for 10 months, and kept no residence in Egypt after the move. In March 2020, Mr. Garcia traveled temporarily to Mexico for his work, but remained a resident of Spain, with an intent to return to Spain at the end of 2020, signing a residential lease in Seville to start on January 1, 2021. At some point, Ms. Ramsis and the child traveled to Egypt, and then to Mexico to visit Mr. Garcia. After 3 months in Mexico, Ms. Ramsis left with SJG, intending to fly to NY and then Egypt to visit family, but once they landed in NY, they remained in the United States, settling in Texas, where Ms. Ramsis filed an application for asylum.

Mr. Garcia filed a petition in the district court seeking return to Spain of SJG. One key issue was whether Spain was the child’s habitual residence. Of the options (Spain, Mexico, Egypt, and the U.S.), the totality of the circumstances pointed to Spain. The second key issue was whether the child should not be returned because of the grave risk presented by Mr. Garcia who was allegedly physically and sexually abusive to Ms. Ramsis. Unfortunately, despite Ms. Ramsis’s assertions that he raped her, threatened her with his ties to the Mexican mafia, and physically harmed her, she made no connection between those acts and any harm to the child. In fact, her only allegation of harm to SJG was that Mr. Garcia watched horror movies with her when she was age 2. The child was, therefore, ordered returned to Spain.

Category iconabduction,  Child Abduction,  Grave Risk,  Habitual Residence,  Hague Abduction Convention

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe

Join 110 others, and get a notification to our new posts right on your inbox.

We promise we’ll never spam! Only notifications of new posts.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

The use of the name MK Family Law is protected as are the logo and content of this website. The information is provided by MK Family Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

© 2023 · MK Family Law · All Rights Reserved · Developed by RDK

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Attorney Advertising