• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer navigation
  • Washington, D.C.
  • melissa@mkfamily.law
  • (202) 713-5165
  • mkfamily.law
Family Law Across Borders

Family Law Across Borders

International Family Law Resources

  • About MKFL
  • Websites
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Events
  • Contact

IPKCA

Case Update (23 Jan 2023): US v. Patel; conviction remains vacated, but November 2022 opinion amended

January 24, 2023

The January 23, 2023 court order is one in a long line of court orders in federal, state, and foreign courts related to the parties and their child. To summarize - the Patels voluntarily signed an agreement in 2017 granting Mr. Patel full custody and the ability to relocate, which he did - to India … Read More about Case Update (23 Jan 2023): US v. Patel; conviction remains vacated, but November 2022 opinion amended

Category iconabduction,  Child Abduction,  conviction,  criminal kidnapping,  IPKCA

Case Update (6 June 2022): USA v. Chaplin; parent’s conviction for kidnapping affirmed on appeal; definition of retention clarified

June 21, 2022

Mr. Leo James Chaplin, an American, met his wife, MDS, in the Philippines. The two moved to the USA, married, and had two children. They lived in Alaska and took vacations to the Philippines. In 2014, Chaplin "convinced MDS and their minor children... to accompany him to the Philippines, where he … Read More about Case Update (6 June 2022): USA v. Chaplin; parent’s conviction for kidnapping affirmed on appeal; definition of retention clarified

Category iconcriminal kidnapping,  IPKCA

Case Update (18 Feb 2022): U.S. v. Patel; federal parental kidnapping and the need for clearly written custody orders

March 17, 2022

The Defendant in this criminal matter is the father of the minor child at issue. Pursuant to a NJ Family Court order from May 2017, the father had sole custody of the child. The mother had no delineated access schedule (only access "as agreed by the parties"). In July 2017, the father and son … Read More about Case Update (18 Feb 2022): U.S. v. Patel; federal parental kidnapping and the need for clearly written custody orders

Category iconabduction,  access,  Child Abduction,  criminal kidnapping,  IPKCA

Case Update (2021): U.S. v. Helbrans; International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act

October 26, 2021

On October 12, 2021, the Court addressed motions in limine filed by Defendants and the Government in a federal criminal case related to the kidnapping of minor children between Guatemala and the United States. You can read more about the case here. It is a fascinating read involving the Jewish … Read More about Case Update (2021): U.S. v. Helbrans; International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act

Category iconabduction,  Child Abduction,  criminal kidnapping,  Hague Abduction Convention,  IPKCA

Case Update (2021): U.S. v. Helbrans, Rosner, et. al.; international kidnapping; Hague Convention

July 20, 2021

The Defendants are members of a Jewish religious community, Lev Tahor. Defendant Nachman Helbrans is the leader of this community. In October 2018, Helbrans' sister left the community in Guatemala with her six children and relocated to the United States. In November 2018, she obtained a … Read More about Case Update (2021): U.S. v. Helbrans, Rosner, et. al.; international kidnapping; Hague Convention

Category iconChild Abduction,  criminal kidnapping,  Hague Abduction Convention,  IPKCA

Case Update (2020): US v. Houtar, international parental kidnapping, whether IPKCA is void for vagueness as applied to a parent who did not “abduct” his children

December 15, 2020

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case of U.S. v. Houtar, recently addressed the issue of whether the International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act (IPKCA) was unconstitutionally vague as applied against a father who had not actually abducted his children, but instead retained his children in … Read More about Case Update (2020): US v. Houtar, international parental kidnapping, whether IPKCA is void for vagueness as applied to a parent who did not “abduct” his children

Category iconabduction,  constitutional,  criminal kidnapping,  IPKCA,  retention,  vague

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe

Join 110 others, and get a notification to our new posts right on your inbox.

We promise we’ll never spam! Only notifications of new posts.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

The use of the name MK Family Law is protected as are the logo and content of this website. The information is provided by MK Family Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

© 2023 · MK Family Law · All Rights Reserved · Developed by RDK

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Attorney Advertising