• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer navigation
  • Washington, D.C.
  • melissa@mkfamily.law
  • (202) 713-5165
  • mkfamily.law
Family Law Across Borders

Family Law Across Borders

International Family Law Resources

  • About MKFL
  • Websites
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Videos
  • Events
  • Contact

DOS Update (17 June 2022): Annual ICAPRA Compliance Report is published

DOS Update (17 June 2022): Annual ICAPRA Compliance Report is published

June 18, 2022

The U.S. Department of State issues a yearly “compliance” report, as mandated by Congress, that visits outstanding child abduction cases from the United States to other countries and explores some of the underlying reasons behind why certain cases remain unresolved.  The report includes both countries where there is a treaty relationship with the United States under the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention and countries where there is no treaty relationship (and, perhaps, no laws in place to facilitate the return of a child to the US).

For the 2022 report (looking at cases from 2021), the below countries were designated as “non-compliant” by the United States.  Non-compliance relates to a country’s “persistent failure” to abide by legal obligations to return children or work with the U.S. government to resolve cases.  Under ICAPRA, a “persistent failure” is where 30% or more of all abduction cases remain unresolved; the foreign country’s Central Authority fails to fulfill its obligations under the Hague Abduction Convention or any bilateral agreements; the judicial or administrative branch fails to implement and comply with the Hague Abduction Convention or bilateral agreements; or, law enforcement regularly fails to enforce return or access orders.

2022 Non-Compliant Countries:

-Argentina (delays in the judiciary, with failure to enact legislation to address this)

-Austria* (delays in communication about the resolution of cases, judicial decisions not consistent with the Convention)

-Belize* (delays in the judiciary)

-Brazil (delays in the judiciary, although a note that a lot of cases that were previously unresolved are now resolved)

-Costa Rica (delays in the judiciary)

-Ecuador (not taking appropriate steps to locate children, delays in the judiciary)

-Egypt (lack of viable legal options)

-Honduras* (Central Authority delays, delays in the judiciary)

-India (refusal to engage in government dialogue, no clear procedure to address child abduction)

-Jordan (lack of legal procedures to address child abduction cases)

-South Korea* (delays in the judiciary, delays in enforcement of return orders)

-Peru (Central Authority delays)

-Romania (delays in the judiciary)

-Trinidad & Tobago* (delays in the judiciary)

-UAE (lack of laws to facilitate the return of children)

*Notes a new country added to the list from 2021. All countries listed in 2021 remained on the 2022 list.

Category iconabduction,  abduction prevention,  Child Abduction,  compliance,  Hague Abduction Convention,  ICAPRA

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe

Join 110 others, and get a notification to our new posts right on your inbox.

We promise we’ll never spam! Only notifications of new posts.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

The use of the name MK Family Law is protected as are the logo and content of this website. The information is provided by MK Family Law and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

© 2023 · MK Family Law · All Rights Reserved · Developed by RDK

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Attorney Advertising